A public library's website is mostly other companies' software: the catalog, ebook apps, event calendars, room booking and databases. How ADA Title II treats that content, what to ask each vendor, and what the library itself must fix.
Most of what a patron does on a public library's website happens in software the library did not write: searching the catalog, placing a hold, borrowing an ebook, signing up for storytime, booking a study room, opening a research database. The library's own pages are often the smallest part. Under the Department of Justice's ADA Title II web rule, much of that vendor software still counts as the library's content. This guide sorts out what the library owns, what it buys, what really is third-party, and how to make progress on each. It is general information, not legal advice.
ADA.gov's fact sheet lists public libraries among the state and local government bodies the rule covers. For the deadline, a library that does not have its own population figure uses the population of the government it belongs to; the fact sheet gives a city library as its example. So a branch system run by a city of 120,000 is on the April 26, 2027 date, and a town library serving 9,000 people is on April 26, 2028. Those are the dates set by the DOJ's April 20, 2026 interim final rule.
Library districts and cooperatives are less clear-cut. Some are special districts in their own right, which moves them to the 2028 date regardless of size; others are created by a city or county. Check how yours was established. If you cannot get a firm answer, plan for the earlier date. The full rule timeline and exceptions are in our ADA Title II deadline guide.
Private, nonprofit libraries open to the public are a different case, generally under Title III rather than this rule. See Section 508 vs ADA Title II vs WCAG if you are unsure which applies.
Sorting content by who controls it tells you who has to fix it and how. The rule's third-party exception is narrower than many libraries assume: it covers content posted by members of the public or others who are not controlled by or acting for the government. Content a contractor provides for you is not third-party content, and neither is third-party material the library itself chooses to post.
| Kind | Examples | Who fixes it | Excepted? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Library-made pages | Hours, locations, news, policies, card sign-up page, programme descriptions, staff reading lists | The library | No |
| 2. Vendor software provided for the library | Catalog and patron account, event calendar, room booking, payment of fines, newsletter sign-up, chat reference widget | The vendor, under pressure from the library | No. Content provided through a contract or licence is still the library's |
| 3. Licensed resources patrons reach through the library | Ebook and audiobook apps, research databases, streaming services, language-learning tools | The vendor | Treat as covered when the library provides or makes it available; get advice on edge cases |
| 4. Content from the public | Patron reviews and tags in the catalog, comments on a blog, community event submissions | The person who posted it | Generally yes, if the library did not post or commission it |
Row 3 is the one to discuss with counsel. The rule reaches content the entity provides "through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements", and a database the library licenses for its patrons looks a lot like that. The practical answer is the same either way: buy accessible products and press the vendors who are not.
The catalog is the library's core service, so it deserves its own test plan. Run these tasks with a keyboard only, then with a screen reader, then on a phone at 200% zoom:
Write down where each task fails and send the list to the vendor with a request for a dated fix plan. Typical problems: filter checkboxes that are not reachable by keyboard, availability shown only as a coloured dot, cover images with the file name as their description, a sign-in that times out without warning, and hold dialogs that trap focus. These are the vendor's to fix, but they are your patrons' barriers, so keep the list and ask again at renewal.
Events are where a library meets families, older adults and job seekers, and the calendar is often a separate tool. Things to check:
The last point is not a WCAG requirement, but it is the most useful line a library calendar can carry. The web rule covers the site. The programme itself still has to be accessible, and the calendar is where people find out how.
Libraries rarely have leverage over a large database publisher alone. They do have it together. Practical steps:
The procurement checklist has accessibility questions you can drop into an RFP or a renewal.
This is the part you control fully, and it tends to be the quickest win. Library-specific patterns to get right:
| Page | Common problem | Better pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Hours and locations | Hours in an image, branch map with no text | A table of hours per branch with header cells, and the address written out under every map |
| Closures | A red banner image saying "Closed today" | A text alert at the top of the page that a screen reader announces as a heading or alert |
| Reading lists | Cover-image carousels that auto-advance | A plain list of titles with author and a catalog link; any carousel can be paused and has real alt text |
| Card sign-up | A PDF form to print and bring in | An online form with labels, plus the printed option for those who want it |
| Policies | Board-approved policies as scanned PDFs | Policies as web pages, with the approval date at the top |
| Local history and digital collections | Scanned photos and documents with no description | Describe items people use now; label older material as an archive if it meets the archive conditions |
| Video and podcasts | Storytime and author talks without captions | Captions on recorded video and transcripts for audio |
Local history collections deserve a careful decision. The rule's archived-content exception applies only to content created before your compliance date, kept only for reference, research or recordkeeping, held in a separate archive area and not changed since. A digitised collection the library is actively adding to does not fit. Prioritise describing the items people request most, and offer descriptions on request for the rest.
Larger systems often have a site per branch, plus separate sites for the Friends of the Library and the library foundation. Two rules of thumb:
We.Inc is a white-label website platform. It can host the library's own pages: the system site and, if you need them, separate branch or programme sites under the library's brand. It does not replace your catalog, ebook platform or databases; those stay with their vendors and you link or embed them. What the platform gives a library web team today:
Sites are built with AI from templates and prompts. We do not claim any site built on the platform conforms to WCAG 2.1 AA, and your team must test what you publish. To see how a library system and its branches would be set up, book a demo, or read the overview for government agencies.
Last checked 2026-10-25.
This guide is general information, not legal advice. Whether a particular licensed resource or partner site is covered depends on your arrangements; ask your own counsel.
Yes. ADA.gov lists public libraries among the state and local government entities covered by the web rule. A library without its own population figure uses the population of the government it belongs to when working out its compliance date.
Both, in practice. Content a library provides through a contract or licence is still the library's under the rule, so the library must press the vendor to fix problems, while the vendor does the fixing.
Content posted by members of the public who are not acting for the library generally falls under the third-party exception. Material the library posts or commissions does not.
Only content that meets all of the archive conditions is excepted: created before the compliance date, kept only for reference, held in a separate archive area and unchanged since. Active collections do not qualify.
No. We.Inc can host the library's own pages and branch sites under its brand. The catalog, ebook platform and databases stay with their vendors.
We.Inc is an AI-powered website builder you can resell under your own brand. Launch a branded client dashboard, bill on Stripe Connect, and deliver AI-generated websites in minutes. White-label pricing is tailored to your volume and setup: book a 30-minute demo for a quote.