A decision test for whether a department, programme or campaign gets its own microsite or a section of the main site, plus naming and domain rules, an approval form, a lifecycle with an end date, and a register template for organisations that run many sites.
Every large organisation has the same argument. Parks wants its own website because the main one is slow to change. The tourism team wants a site with its own look. A grant-funded programme needs something live in three weeks. Each request is reasonable on its own. Ten years later there are forty sites, a dozen domains nobody remembers registering, six different contact pages and no one who can say which ones are still maintained. This guide gives you a test for saying yes or no, the rules to attach to a yes, and a way to retire sites before they rot.
A microsite is any website that sits outside your main site's navigation and templates, with its own address. It might be a subdomain (parks.example.gov), a separate domain (visitexample.com), or a site on a third-party platform. A section of the main site (example.gov/parks) is not a microsite, even if it has its own banner. The distinction matters because a section inherits your templates, search, navigation, accessibility fixes and review process. A microsite inherits none of them unless you make it.
Ask the requesting team to answer these seven questions in writing. A microsite is justified only if the answers to at least two of the first four are yes, and the answers to all of the last three are yes.
| # | Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is the audience mostly people who would never visit the main site (tourists, investors, a national audience)? | If residents or members are the audience, they will look on the main site first |
| 2 | Does it need a brand that must look different from the parent, for a reason outside the team's preference (a partnership, a separately governed body)? | "We want our own look" is not a reason; "this is a joint venture with two other counties" is |
| 3 | Does it need functions the main site cannot provide (a store, bookings, a members' area)? | Check first whether the main platform can add it |
| 4 | Is it a time-limited campaign with a clear end date? | Campaigns are the best fit, as long as they actually end |
| 5 | Is there a named owner, by role, who will maintain it for its whole life? | Sites without owners are where outdated and inaccessible content collects |
| 6 | Will it use the organisation's approved templates or meet the same accessibility and security bar? | A microsite is still your content; under ADA Title II, content provided through a contractor is still the public entity's |
| 7 | Is there budget for its running costs and its retirement? | Domains, hosting, testing and the work of shutting it down cost money every year |
If the request fails, offer a section of the main site with a distinct landing page. Most teams asking for a microsite actually want three things: speed, a page they control and a short address. A good section with delegated editing and a short redirect gives them all three.
Once a separate presence is justified, choose its address deliberately.
| Option | Use it when | Costs and risks |
|---|---|---|
| Section: example.gov/parks | The default for any department or permanent programme | Depends on the main platform being easy enough for the department to edit |
| Subdomain: parks.example.gov | A distinct application or a site on a different platform, still clearly part of the organisation | Search engines may treat it as a separate site; separate analytics and certificates to manage |
| Separate domain: visitexample.com | Audiences outside your jurisdiction, partnerships, campaigns with their own name | Annual renewal, phishing look-alike risk, residents cannot tell it is official, link equity starts from zero |
| Short redirect: example.gov/fair | A campaign that needs a printable address | None worth mentioning; use these generously |
For US public bodies there is an extra reason to keep things under one name. The .gov registry, run by CISA, says organisations generally cannot get more than one .gov domain, including naming variations. A department that wants its own name therefore usually ends up on a commercial domain, which residents have less reason to trust. A subdomain of your .gov keeps the official signal.
Copy this into your intake form. Making the requester write the answers down filters out most weak requests on its own.
| Field | Answer |
|---|---|
| Name of site and proposed address | |
| Requesting department and owner role (not a person's name only) | |
| Backup owner role | |
| Audience and the top three tasks they will do | |
| Answers to the seven-question test | |
| Why a section of the main site will not work | |
| Platform and template to be used | |
| Functions needed (forms, bookings, store, members' area) | |
| Launch date and planned end or review date | |
| Annual budget, including domain, testing and retirement | |
| Who approves content before it goes live | |
| Accessibility test plan before launch |
The real cost of microsites is not building them. It is that each one ends up on a different platform, with a different login, a different contractor and a different idea of what "done" means. The single most effective rule is that every approved microsite is built on a platform the central web team can see and manage. That gives you:
Departments ask for microsites mostly because they want to publish without waiting. Give them that, within limits:
| Can do without asking | Needs central sign-off |
|---|---|
| Edit text, images and events on their own site | Launching the site, and relaunching after a redesign |
| Add news posts and pages within the template | Connecting a new domain |
| Invite colleagues to edit | Adding a store, payments or a members' area |
| Request a short redirect | Changing the template or brand colours |
Microsites rarely die on purpose. Build the end into the start.
Keep one sheet. ADA.gov's first steps for the Title II web rule begin with knowing how many websites you have; this register is that answer, kept current.
| Site | Address | Owner role | Platform | Launched | Review or end date | Last accessibility test | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Summer Reading 2027 | example.gov/read | Youth services manager | Main platform | 2027-05 | 2027-09 end | 2027-04 | Live |
Put the rules above into your website governance policy so they survive staff changes, and include the platform requirements in your RFP when you next go to market.
We.Inc is a white-label website platform: one brand, many sites, managed from one admin area. An organisation can put its own name on it and give each department or programme its own site. What is true today:
Sites are built with AI from templates and prompts, so every site still needs your own accessibility and content review before launch; we do not claim any site conforms to WCAG. To see a brand with several department sites set up, book a demo. The public-sector overview is on our government agencies page.
Last checked 2026-10-25.
This guide is general information, not legal advice.
When its audience mostly would not visit the main site, it needs a distinct brand for a reason beyond preference, it needs functions the main site cannot provide, or it is a time-limited campaign, and it also has a named owner, meets the same accessibility and security bar, and has budget for running and retiring it.
A section of the main site is the default for departments and permanent programmes. Use a subdomain for a distinct application still clearly part of the organisation, and a separate domain only for outside audiences, partnerships or named campaigns.
Generally not. get.gov says organisations generally cannot get more than one .gov domain, including naming variations, so departments usually use sections or subdomains of the main .gov.
Move content still needed into the main site, redirect every old URL, archive what must be kept, keep the domain registered for a period so nobody else can use it, then revoke access and update the register.
Yes. We.Inc runs many sites under one brand with shared branding, roles, per-site permissions, optional single-step publishing approval, an audit log, custom domains and code export. Each site still needs your own accessibility testing.
We.Inc is an AI-powered website builder you can resell under your own brand. Launch a branded client dashboard, bill on Stripe Connect, and deliver AI-generated websites in minutes. White-label pricing is tailored to your volume and setup: book a 30-minute demo for a quote.