A health system that grew by acquisition usually inherits websites with the buildings: a rural hospital on an old CMS, an orthopaedic group on a template site, a foundation run by volunteers, a cancer centre built by an agency for a campaign. This page is about getting those under one brand and one set of rules, what the HHS Section 504 web rule now asks of federally funded providers, and the hard line between a marketing site and anything that touches patient data.
Ask a system marketing team how many websites they run and the first answer is "one". The real number turns up during an acquisition review or a breach scare, and it is rarely below twenty. The sources are predictable.
Each of these is legitimate. The problem is not that they exist. It is that they are built on different platforms, approved by nobody in particular, and owned by whoever signed the original invoice.
Before any platform decision, write down what you have. This is the register we suggest; copy it into a spreadsheet.
| Column | What goes in it | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Site name and address | The live web address and any old addresses that redirect to it | Acquired sites often have three domains pointing at one site |
| Entity | Which hospital, group, foundation or programme it represents | Determines which legal entity is responsible and which Section 504 date applies |
| Business owner | A named role in that entity, not a vendor | Somebody must be able to say yes to changes and to retiring the site |
| Editors | Who actually changes content today | Usually a coordinator, a practice manager or an agency |
| Forms on the site | Every form and where its submissions go | The single biggest privacy risk on marketing sites |
| Tracking scripts | Analytics, ad pixels, chat widgets, heat maps | Needs privacy and compliance review on health sites |
| Clinical links | Patient portal, scheduling, bill pay, price transparency files | These must point at the system's real tools, not copies |
| Review date | When content was last checked by the owner | Provider lists and hours go stale fastest |
| Planned end | For campaigns and transitional sites | Stops forgotten sites piling up |
The "forms" and "tracking scripts" columns are the ones that tend to produce surprises. Fill them in first.
Facility and service-line sites exist to help people find care: locations, hours, services, providers, directions, how to book. They should not themselves collect or store health information about patients.
A workable rule for every site in the register:
We.Inc is a website platform for marketing and information sites. We do not offer a business associate agreement and we do not present the platform as suitable for protected health information. Use it for the public face of a facility, and keep anything clinical in the clinical systems you already run.
The Department of Health and Human Services' 2024 Section 504 rule requires recipients of HHS federal financial assistance (which includes hospitals and clinics that take Medicare or Medicaid funding) to make their web content and mobile apps meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA. In May 2026 HHS published an interim final rule that moved the compliance dates back by one year:
The standard itself did not change, and HHS said the extension does not delay other Section 504 duties. A large system will almost always fall in the first group, but separately owned affiliates and small physician practices may not; your counsel should confirm which entity is the recipient for each site in the register. Public hospitals owned by a county or a hospital district may also be covered by the ADA Title II web rule, which has its own dates; see our ADA Title II deadline guide and the Section 508 vs Title II vs WCAG explainer.
What this means for the long tail: a vendor-built service-line site is still the provider's content. PDFs matter too, especially patient forms, financial assistance policies and price lists. A platform cannot make content conform on its own. Templates can be built to help, but alt text, heading order, link wording, colour contrast and every uploaded document need checking by your own team or an auditor. Our accessibility checklist is a practical starting point.
We.Inc is a white-label site platform. The system runs one brand account under its own name, and each facility, service line, foundation or programme gets its own client account and site inside it.

*The client manager in the brand console (demo brand). In a health system, each row would be a facility, a service line or a programme, tagged by region or entity.*
Every site has its own switches: whether it can publish, connect its own domain, see the code, run a blog, take form submissions and change SEO settings. A rural clinic's page can have forms switched off entirely. The foundation can have forms and a blog. A residency programme might get a blog but no custom domain.

*Per-site switches, including "Publishing needs my approval". Forms can be switched off for any site that has no reason to collect anything.*
System marketing can require approval before a site goes live, as the default for every site or for selected ones. Requests wait in a queue where an admin can approve and publish, or ask for changes. It is a single approval step by the brand account, not a multi-stage clinical or legal review chain, so if your process needs compliance and legal sign-off as separate steps, those happen before the request is approved.

*The approval queue. The request in this demo screen was staged for the screenshot.*
The audit log records organisation actions, such as changes to a client's settings, so you can answer "who switched forms back on for this clinic?" without asking around.

*The audit log in the brand console. In this demo it shows two edits made to a client's settings.*
Each site can sit on its own domain or on a subdomain of the system domain. Acquired hospitals can keep a familiar address during the transition and move later, and the system decides per site whether its editors may connect a domain at all.

*Connecting a domain from inside a site's editor.*
Practice managers and service-line coordinators can describe a change in plain English and the AI makes it, or click a heading or button and change it directly. Every change they make still goes through approval if the site requires it.

*The visual editor. Content changes still need your own accessibility check before publishing.*
Each site's code can be downloaded as a ZIP or synced to GitHub. If a facility is sold, or the system changes platform, the site leaves with its code rather than being rebuilt. The contract side of that is in our vendor exit plan guide.

*The code panel, with the full source of the site and a download button.*
If that goes well, the same pattern covers the rest. Our governance policy template has wording for owners, review cycles and retiring sites. Book a demo and bring your register.
Last checked 2026-10-25.
This page is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your obligations with your counsel and privacy office.
Book a demo. Pricing is tailored to your volume and setup, and you get your exact price on the call. 0% transaction fee.
After the May 2026 interim final rule, recipients of HHS federal financial assistance with 15 or more employees must comply by May 11, 2027, and those with fewer than 15 employees by May 10, 2028. The standard is WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
No. We.Inc is for public marketing and information sites. We do not offer a business associate agreement. Link appointment, intake and portal tasks to your existing clinical systems and keep forms to contact details only.
Yes. Approval before publishing can be the default for every site or set per site. It is a single approval step by the brand account; any separate legal or compliance review happens before that approval.
Yes. Each site can use its own custom domain or a subdomain of the system domain, and the system decides per site whether its editors may connect a domain.
No platform does that by itself. Templates can be built to help, but your team or an auditor must test each site and every uploaded document against WCAG 2.1 AA.
We.Inc is an AI-powered website builder you can resell under your own brand. Launch a branded client dashboard, bill on Stripe Connect, and deliver AI-generated websites in minutes. White-label pricing is tailored to your volume and setup: book a 30-minute demo for a quote.