CivicPlus sells local governments a connected suite: the website, resident self-service, payments, permits and meeting video. If you want all of that from one vendor, it is a reasonable choice and we would not talk you out of it. But many public bodies also run sites that sit outside the main city website: a library foundation, a parks programme, a tourism board, an events site, a special district. This page is about those sites, and about smaller bodies that need a good website more than a suite.
On its Municipal Websites page, checked today, CivicPlus says its former CivicEngage product "has been rebranded as CivicPlus Municipal Websites", a content management system for local governments. The page describes:
That is a coherent proposition: one vendor for the public-facing side of a municipality. If your priority is joining up the website with bill payment, permits and alerts, a suite like this solves a problem a website builder does not try to solve.
The municipal website is one site. Ask your communications team how many others the organisation actually runs, and the list is usually longer than anyone expects:
These sites tend to be built ad hoc on whatever a staff member knew, paid for on a credit card, and forgotten when that person leaves. They carry the same accessibility and records duties as the main site, with none of the oversight. Putting all of them into the main civic CMS is one answer; it can also mean every small site waits in the same queue as the main site's priorities.
We.Inc treats each site owner (a department, board or programme) as an account under your brand. The central team sees every site in one register, sets what each owner can do, and decides which sites need approval before they go live.

*One register for every satellite site and its owner. Tag by department, programme or review date.*

*Adding a new site owner: an invitation in your organisation's name.*

*Defaults for every owner: whether they can publish directly, use their own domain, run forms and so on.*
The approval is single-step. A programme manager presses Publish; the site goes live once a central owner approves it or sends it back with notes. If your policy requires legal or communications review in sequence, that happens before the central owner approves.
| Need | CivicPlus Municipal Websites (from its page) | We.Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Main municipal website | Core product | Possible for small bodies; larger municipalities may prefer a civic suite |
| Online bill pay, permits, issue reporting | Resident self-service described | Not offered |
| Single resident login across services | Resident Portal described | Not offered |
| Meeting video | CivicPlus Video described | Not offered |
| Many small sites under central rules | Ask CivicPlus how it handles this | Core: register, per-owner switches, approval, audit log |
| Building a site | Drag-and-drop CMS | AI builds from a description; owners edit visually |
| Accessibility | Accessibility-focused design plus a separate accessibility product | Built to help you meet WCAG 2.1 AA; your team must test |
| Leaving | Ask about export terms | Every site's code can be downloaded or synced to GitHub |
ADA.gov currently lists the compliance dates for the Title II web rule as 26 April 2027 for state and local governments with a population of 50,000 or more, and 26 April 2028 for smaller public entities and special district governments, following an interim final rule published in April 2026. Satellite sites are public entity websites too. Whatever platform runs them, someone needs to test them. Our Title II guide explains what the rule covers. This page is general information, not legal advice.
We.Inc does not claim WCAG conformance for AI-generated sites. The output is built to help you meet WCAG 2.1 AA, and the visual editor lets owners fix headings, contrast and text directly, but your team must test each site before it goes live. Approval before publishing is a sensible place to put that test.

*Owners can fix a button's colour or a heading's level themselves when an accessibility check flags it.*
Public bodies have to explain decisions later. We.Inc keeps an audit log of organisation actions (owners added or removed, switches changed, approvals), and every site can be exported, so the organisation is not tied to us. We do not claim certifications or hosting regions; our security questionnaire guide lists what to ask any vendor, including us.

*The audit log: who changed an owner's settings, and when.*
Most public bodies cannot list their satellite sites from memory. A one-afternoon audit usually finds them:
Put the result in a register with an owner, a purpose and a review date. That list is the real scope of your web estate, and it is what you should take to any vendor, including CivicPlus and us.
Book a demo and bring the list of sites your organisation runs outside the main website.
Last checked 2026-10-25.
Book a demo. Pricing is tailored to your volume and setup, and you get your exact price on the call. 0% transaction fee.
According to CivicPlus, it is the rebranded CivicEngage product: a content management system for local governments connected to resident self-service, a Resident Portal and CivicPlus Video.
No. We.Inc builds and runs websites. It does not process permits or utility bills or provide a resident services portal.
No. Sites are AI-generated and built to help you meet WCAG 2.1 AA, but your team must test each one. Approval before publishing is a good point for that check.
ADA.gov currently lists 26 April 2027 for public entities with a population of 50,000 or more and 26 April 2028 for smaller entities and special districts. This is general information, not legal advice.
We.Inc is an AI-powered website builder you can resell under your own brand. Launch a branded client dashboard, bill on Stripe Connect, and deliver AI-generated websites in minutes. White-label pricing is tailored to your volume and setup: book a 30-minute demo for a quote.